Section III.Dual Rejections and Intensified
Americanization
A. Dual Rejections from America and Germany
Realizing that the
“American” message of the Bund was resonating with neither the American public nor
the government, the Bund sought to challenge America’s misperception.By intensifying their anti-Communist platform
they hoped to gain more “American” credibility and win more sympathy to their
cause.On July 3, 1937 the Bund held their annual
convention at the Hotel Biltmore in New
York.Delegates
from sixty three Bund units attended the convention.Even more so than ever, the Bund presented a
vehement anti-Communist platform. The Bund released numerous press reports
which stressed the organization’s determination to continue to fight Jewish
Communism in America.Once again, they presented their usual
arguments:Germans and Americans were
tied together in a mutual struggle against the evils and dangers of Communism
and the Bund stood at the vanguard of this battle.
In
July 1937 Kuhn sent a telegram to FDR insisting that members of the Bund were
loyal American citizens entirely committed to the Constitution and democratic
institutions of America.Kuhn sent a personal telegram to Secretary of
State Cordell Hull which emphasized Bund loyalty to America and protested anti-German
propaganda and the Jewish boycott which was harming US-German relations.A third telegram was sent to the U.S.
Congress in the form of a resolution adopted by the Bund Convention of 1937.Calling the Bund a “fighting organization”
the Bund demanded the immediate passage of legislation which would outlaw
subversive parties and organizations and require loyalty oaths to the
Constitution from all individuals in public life.[1] Typical
of the Bund’s dual allegiance, immediately after the 1937 convention, Kuhn also
sent telegrams to Hitler and German Foreign Minister von Neurath proclaiming
the Bund’s “undying union with the homeland” and he pledged to continue working
for friendly relations between the United States
and Germany.
By mid-1937, the
Bund increased the size of the English language section of the Deutschter Weckrf und Beobachter and
dedicated more articles warning America
of the communist specter. Articles in the Deutscher
Weckruf und Beobachter warned Americans that communist activities all over
the world threatened the security of the United States and therefore needed
to be ferociously combated.[2]Bund literaturecontinued to petition the German-American
community to fulfill their Germanic/American obligation to fight communism by
joining the German American Bund.Messages implored,
You German Americans who as Americans
realize that it is your duty to help outlaw Jewish international atheistic
Communism…Join the German American Bund! An essential part of the movement of
the 100 million Aryan, white, gentile Americans fighting to reconstitute our
country into a free and sovereign, God-fearing, moral, socially-just and
national United States.[3]
Despite the Bund’s
efforts to sell its anti-Communist and pro-American message to the public,
American audiences continued to denounce the Bund and all they stood for.Because of the obvious foreign-inspired
fascist trappings, the American public never bought into the Bund’s the message
and it remained perhaps the most reviled organization in America. Violent clashes with
opponents were common.In Bergen County, N.J.
at a Bund meeting at a private residence, members of the American Legion provoked
a fistfight in their efforts to break up the meeting.[4]
Similarly, a series of fistfights broke up a meeting of nearly seven hundred
Bundists in BuffaloNew York as the Bund attempted a membership
drive.Labor organizations, veteran
groups, and “patriotic” clubs all fervently took to the streets and brought
violence to the Bund.In Newark, during a Bund rally at Schwabenhalle
Hall, an all-out brawl ensued between Bundists and Jewish protesters.Police dispatched one hundred and fifty
officers to break up the fight and twenty persons were arrested.On their way to a Bund meeting in Irvington, a group of New
Jersey Bundists were attacked by antifascists.Two people were hospitalized and thirty-five others were jailed.At Trenton, New Jersey and PhiladelphiaPennsylvania, near riot
situations broke out when Wilhelm Kunze attempted to speak before Bund
gatherings. Hundreds of anti-Nazis booed
Kunze off the stage and police had to protect his exit from the angry mobs
gathering outside.On April 20, 1938, a crowd of 3,500
people gathered at the Yorkville Casino to celebrate Hitler’s 49th
birthday.Unbeknownst to the Bund, one
hundred American Legion members infiltrated the celebration and an all-out
brawl erupted between the Bund’s OD and the American Legionnaires.The Yorkville Casino riot resulted in
numerous badly beaten victims and aroused even more indignation against the
Bund.The Bund was becoming notorious
and violence against the Bund was becoming an all-too common feature at Bund
rallies and meeting.
While violent
reaction to Nazi-inspired fascism was a common feature in America in the 1930s, Americans
were not always consistent in their views of foreign or even home-grown
variations of American fascism. Americans
were much more tolerant of Italian and Italian-American strains of fascism than
they were of German Nazism.[5] In
fact, Mussolini’s brand of fascism evoked an ambivalent, or even occasionally
favorable impression by many Americans.In 1932 Pennsylvania Senator David Reed announced, “I do not often envy
other countries their governments, but I say that if this country ever needed a
Mussolini it needs one now.”[6]While Nazism and virtually all its offshoots was
consistently demonized by the American public and the press, the Bund did, in
fact, manage to find a handful of very
notable supporters in America.Prominent
Philadelphia figures like Lutheran clergyman
Kurt E. Molzahn not only openly supported the Bund, but he distributed Bund
propaganda supplied to him by the Auslands-Institut
in Germany.[7]
Sigmund von Bosse, a minister representing the Philadelphia General Conference
of the LutheranChurch, also became a leading activist
for the Bund.Bosse became an open Nazi
sympathizer and frequently spoke at Bund meetings.Although not a keynote speaker at the MadisonSquareGarden rally in 1939, he denounced the
“internationalists serpents of intrigue” and asserted that “if Washington were alive
today, he would be a friend of Adolf Hitler, just as he was of Fredrick the
Great.”[8] The
presence of well-known community figures was invaluable for the Bund because it
gave the appearance of a mainstream respectable group, despite the deluge of
bad press they received.
Other notable
figures were willing to be openly associated with the Bund.For example, Congressman Fritz Gartnew, a
former attorney for the Bund paper, the Philadelphia Weckruf,
served in the state House of Representatives in 1933-34.The 1939 German Day celebration at Philadelphia’s
Metropolitan Opera House was chaired by Sigmund von Bosse and the Bund even
managed to secure U.S. Senator James J. Davis as chief speaker.Nazi embelms were muted for the event, yet Davis’s speech was
responded with “Heils” and Hitler
salutes.Also in attendance at the 1939
German Day celebration were two U.S.
congressmen, James P. McGranery and Fritz Gartner.State Senator Dolan of SussexCounty not only attended the opening
celebration at CampNordland with a crowd of
eight to ten thousand, but he delivered an address of welcome.Senator Dolan remarked that “it was a remarkably
well-conducted affair.”He added, “the
members were all introduced to me as American citizens.I had no reason to doubt it and do not doubt
it now.True, the Swastika flag was
shown, but the American flag was strongly in evidence and the band played the
Star Spangled Banner. The camp seemed to be all it was advertised to be- a camp
for children of German descent and a recreation place for their parents.”[9]
As the Bund
attempted to balance their political platform between the interests of the
homeland and the interests of their adopted nation, in early 1938 they found
themselves unequivocally rejected by both nations.Attacks against the Bund in America were the norm.Repeatedly, government agencies and private
organizations accused the Bund of being nothing other than a subversive
organization, an espionage ring in the service of Nazi Germany.It was certainly true that numerous German
agencies engaged in the dissemination of German propaganda in the United States.The AO, DAI, VDA, the German Foreign
Ministry, Foreign Affairs Office and the
Transocean News Service (a press organization designed by the German Foreign
Office which operated through thePropaganda Ministry), all transmitted a variety of National Socialist
propaganda to a wide range of organizations, consulates, and private citizens
around the world, including the United States.
However,
by 1936, as the Third Reich became more ambitious in its European pursuits, the
Nazi regime became very interested in creating a sense of security within the United States.In an attempt to assuage the American
disfavor towards Germany
created by the activities of the German American Bund, in May 1937, Germany appointed Hans Dieckhoff as German
Ambassador to the United
States. In October 1937, Prentiss B. Gilbert, the
American Charge d’Affaires in Berlin, paid a
visit to the Foreign Ministry at the behest of the U.S. State Department to
express concern over the conduct of Germans in America and the state of
German-American relations.Gilbert
recommended that the AO be informed of the disquiet created by the German
American Bund.As a result, the Foreign
Office concluded that it would best serve German interest if the regime cut all
ties with the Bund.Senior Councilor
Hans Freytag wrote in a memo dated October 11, 1937 that the NSDAP had nothing to do with
German American clubs and that there was absolutely no connection between the
German government and the German American Bund.Nevertheless, Dieckhoff sent a dispatch the following month reporting
that the activities of the Bund were suspected as being directed by Germany and rumors of a “fifth column” were
widely circulated in America.Comparisons of Nazi influence abroad were
being made to the Communist Comitern.He
complained that “nothing has resulted in so much hostility towards us in the
last few months as the stupid and noisy activities of a handful of
German-Americans.”[10] Statements
by the German Consul Generals of New York and Chicago corroborated such
sentiments, emphasizing that German-American relations were being jeopardized
by the activities of the Bund.
On
January 7, 1938,
Dieckhoff conducted an intensive study of the history of the German element in
the United States
and the effect of this history on German-American relations.He concluded that because of its size, the
German-American element in the U.S.
was basically useless as a political vehicle for National Socialism.Although there were twelve to fifteen million
German Americans in the U.S.,
he found that no more than one third of them could read or speak German or be
expected to have any feeling of Deutschtum.[11] He
concluded that the Bund had failed to sway the American public and had only
isolated itself to the detriment of German-U.S. relations.Thus, Dieckhoff proposed the following: Germany should pursue no aims among the German
element in America,
political contact between Germany
and the Bund must be stopped, German nationals must withdraw from the Bund,
Reich authorities must not concern themselves with the internal affairs of the
Bund, and the German government should openly disavow the Bund.[12]
In response to
Dieckhoff’s recommendations in January and February 1938, meetings were held in
Germany
between the Cultural-Political Section of the Foreign Ministry, the political
and intelligence divisions of the Foreign Ministry, the VDM, the AO, and the
Ministry of Propaganda.As far as the
German government was concerned, the fate of the Bund was sealed.It was agreed that Kuhn would be told that Germany
would not tolerate the presence of German nationals in the Bund, and the Bund
was henceforth forbidden to use Party insignia, including the use of the German
swastika flag.Moreover, all German
authorities should immediately sever their connections with the Bund and all
German citizens must immediately terminate their membership in the Bund and/or any
affiliated American organizations.If
Kuhn chose to visit Germany
to argue against these decisions, he would be met only by a representative of
the VDM, the agency delegated to monitor ethnic Germans abroad.Moreover, Kuhn was forbidden to discuss the
Bund publicly while in Germany.
Aware of the
considerable controversy and potential diplomatic crisis created by the actions
of the Bund, Berlin
decisively severed any and all connections with the organization.Berlin
pronounced,
The Volksbund…is a purely American
organization that has frequently engaged in violent controversy with other
organizations such as the American Legion, on both ideological and political
issues.For that reason, it is
emphasized here, Reich German citizens have no business to belong to it, nor
has the Volksbund the right to display the German flag.Germany,
it is said, has been charged with “Nazi propaganda” in the United States on both counts, and
is determined to avoid everything that might lend support to that charge.[13]
On March 1, 1938, Berlin made a public announcement prohibiting
German nationals from maintaining membership in either the German American Bund
or the Prospective Citizens League.The announcement
read:
On account of numerous inquiries being
received from German citizens living in the United States the German Government
reiterates that German citizens must not belong to the Amerika-Deutsche Volksbund or to possible substitute organizations
of that kind.German citizens who in
ignorance of this standing order have become members of the Amerika-Deutsche Volksbund or the
Prospective Citizen’s League must resign from these organizations at once.[14]
The announcement was unequivocal;
German citizens were to resign their membership in the Bund and refrain from any
and all involvement in American politics.Thus, with one Alexandrian stroke the Nazi regime washed its hands of
the whole German American Bund issue and decisively disentangled itself from
any potential diplomatic crisis with the United States.
In the winter of
1937, both the Auslandsorganizationder NSDAP and the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle, the central party agency concerned with
racial Germans aboard, promised to sever all connections with
German-Americans.Both organizations did
not necessarily hold to the promise, but shortly after they were caught
corresponding with the Bund, they too severed all ties. Despite these
infractions, historian Joachim Remack contends that, “on the whole, the Germans
did abide.”[15]
Fritz
Kuhn and the Bund were stunned by the Nazi Party’s decision.After passionately devoting so much of his
life to the Bund, it seemed to Kuhn that all his efforts were being crushed by
the very government he so revered.This
made the rejection all the more painful.Had not the Bund stood for everything that Germany would want them to?Had not the Bund done everything to promote
National Socialist notions of Deutschtum
and worked tirelessly for the benefit of its beloved Heimat as well as for its fellow German-Americans?To Kuhn, it appeared that Germany’s decision was “tantamount
to the destruction of the Bund.”[16]Kuhn sprang to action and raced to Germany
to appeal the decision.However, on this
visit there was no fanfare and no special treatment.In Germany, Kuhn received a rather
cold reception and his contact was limited to Hitler’s adjutant Fritz Wiedemann
who remained unmoved by Kuhn’s implorations.Wiedemann informed Kuhn that the decision to remove all German nationals
from the Bund was final and that his fumbling imitation of the Party had only
damaged German-American relations.To
demonstrate even further the German government’s disconnect with the Bund,
Wiedemann told Kuhn that he could give him no instructions because Kuhn was an
American citizen. Wiedemann added that he intended to inform the American
ambassador of his conversation with Kuhn.
[2] “When
the Soviets seize Outer Mongolia,
America is that
nearer to danger.When the Reds…take
over factories in France,
your job is in that much more danger.When the Spanish Reds burn churches…you are being treated to a foretaste
of what they are planning to do to your churches.Every link forged into the Red chain
strengthens the Red grip on your own life.There’s no room for the “what do I care” attitude…You must care, or you
will pay for your carelessness with your own life and those of your loved
ones.For your own personal welfare-
keep informed on the World Revolution.Read the facts in the Deutscher Weckruf und Beobachter.”Deutscher
Weckruf und Beobachter, 8
July, 1937.
[3]Deutscher
Weckruf und Beobachter, 10
March, 1938.
[4]
“Bund Chief Scores Jews; Kuhn, At Jersey
Meeting, Chides Legion Man For Opposition,” New
York Times, 8 February,
1938.
[5] While Americans were largely reviled by the German
Nazi regime, they by-and-large harbored an ambiguous attitude toward the
Mussolini regime of Italy.In fact, in the 1920’s Mussolini garnered a
great deal of praise from American public and political figures.Historian John P. Diggins remarked that “it
is a strange irony of history that Mussolini’s Fascist dictatorship drew more
admiration from democratic America
than from any other Western nation.”For
many Americans in the 1920’s and 1930’s, it seemed that fascism under Mussolini
was working while capitalism elsewhere was failing.Mussolini’s fascist dictatorship found a
favorable audience with prominent liberals such as historian Charles Beard,
philosophers Herbert W. Schneider and Horace Kallen, and democratic reformer
Lincoln Steffens.Muckrakers like S.S.
McClure and Ida Tarbell visited and returned from Italy singing the praises of
Mussolini, who “like Theodore Roosevelt, revitalized his country with an
outburst of strenuous idealism. Similarly Charles Beard likened Mussolini’s
energy to the “American gospel of action, action, action” much like Theodore
Roosevelt. Kallen believed that fascism “reinvigorated the spirit of
nationalism and of the Risorgimento, and it was the proper philosophy for the
peculiar history, needs, and psychology of the Italian people. Liberals should
therefore suspend judgment until the full-grown tree of the new theory bore
fruit of social justice or the seeds of oppressive reaction… In this respect,
the Fascist revolution is not unlike the Communist revolution.” Fascism’s appeal to liberals was in its
experimental and anti-dogmatic nature.John
P. Diggins, “Flirtation with Fascism: American Pragmatic Liberals and
Mussolini’s Italy.”
The American Historical Review 71 (January 1966): 487-506
[13]Berlin decree quoted in Canedy, America’s
Nazis, 161-162.Germany’s rejection of the Bund produced mixed reactions in America.While the U.S. State department, Charge
d’Affaires Gilbert and Secretary of State Hull responded favorably to the
decision, the New York Times and news
magazines like Time reported that
Dieckhoff’s statement was merely a reiteration of Germany’s 1935 edict which ordered
all German nationals out of the Friends of the New Germany, a move that
produced little real results.Herzstein, Hitler
and Rooseveltt, 157.
[14]
“Hitler Again Orders Nazis Here To Quit Bund and All Such Groups: German Ambassador Informs Hull
of Demand Sent to Nationals in America-
Upward of 400,000 Affected,” New York
Times, 1 March, 1938.
[15] Remack, “‘Friends of the New Germany’: The Bund and
German-American Relations,” 39.
[16] Remack, “‘Friends of the New Germany’: The Bund and
German-American Relations,” 39.